On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Han Shen(沈涵) wrote:
> Hi, I'd like to ping the patch '-fstack-protector-strong':
>
> - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00945.html
> Add a new option '-fstack-protector-strong' to protect only
> stack-smashing-vulnerable functions.
I see this is now in?
Can you
On 05/07/2013 11:20 AM, Han Shen(沈涵) wrote:
How do you plan on handling Florian's retslot issue? Are you going to scan
the gimple looking for suitable calls? How do you avoid instrumentation in
the callee for that case?
I find myself wondering if you'd be better off scanning the gimple
repres
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 04/26/2013 10:45 AM, Han Shen(沈涵) wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I'd like to ping the patch '-fstack-protector-strong':
>>
>> - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00945.html
>>Add a new option '-fstack-protector-strong' to protect only
>> stack-
On 04/26/2013 10:45 AM, Han Shen(沈涵) wrote:
Hi, I'd like to ping the patch '-fstack-protector-strong':
- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00945.html
Add a new option '-fstack-protector-strong' to protect only
stack-smashing-vulnerable functions.
Thanks,
H.
In cfgexpand.c, plea
Hi, I'd like to ping the patch '-fstack-protector-strong':
- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00945.html
Add a new option '-fstack-protector-strong' to protect only
stack-smashing-vulnerable functions.
Thanks,
H.
