The patch well fix the adobe_cpp performance regression on the int8_t
type. But the same degradation exists on uint8_t type, which is not
fixed by the patch referenced in PR53676.
With the signed version, the code:
result_5 = (signed char) ((int) result_2 + 2)
is now well narrowed to:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Laurent Alfonsi laurent.alfo...@st.com wrote:
The patch well fix the adobe_cpp performance regression on the int8_t type.
But the same degradation exists on uint8_t type, which is not fixed by the
patch referenced in PR53676.
With the signed version, the code:
