On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 09:12:20AM -0400, Lewis Hyatt via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Great, thank you very much for taking a look at it. Sorry if this
> email is unnecessary noise, but it wasn't quite clear to me whether
> this should also still be approved from a content perspective? I
> didn't want to
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 9:12 AM Lewis Hyatt wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 6:23 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
> > > Just checking whether the below is OK for gcc 10 changes.html please.
> > > Thanks!
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg
Great, thank you very much for taking a look at it. Sorry if this
email is unnecessary noise, but it wasn't quite clear to me whether
this should also still be approved from a content perspective? I
didn't want to assume. Thanks!
-Lewis
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 6:23 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
> On
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
> Just checking whether the below is OK for gcc 10 changes.html please. Thanks!
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg01667.html
Yes, this looks fine to me from a web perspective.
Thank you,
Gerald
Hello-
Just checking whether the below is OK for gcc 10 changes.html please. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg01667.html
-Lewis
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 10:25 AM Lewis Hyatt wrote:
>
> Hello-
>
> There was a comment on PR67224:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
