In https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-06/msg00150.html
I wrote
I am now trying to do the back port to 4.9 and I got two failures: ...
Actually I did not applied the right patch, with it the testsuite pass without
regression. Still OK for 4.9.1?
TIA
Dominique
Dear Dominique,
On condition that your commit the right patch :-), OK for 4.9.1
Cheers
Paul
On 7 July 2014 13:48, Dominique Dhumieres domi...@lps.ens.fr wrote:
In https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-06/msg00150.html
I wrote
I am now trying to do the back port to 4.9 and I got two failures:
On condition that your commit the right patch :-), OK for 4.9.1
Indeed! Committed as r212329.
Thanks for the review.
Dominique
Dear Paul,
Late thanks for the review, the patch has been committed to trunk at r211405.
OK for trunk and, I would suggest 4.9.
I am now trying to do the back port to 4.9 and I got two failures:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_basics_1.f90 -O* scan-tree-dump-times original
builtin_free 18
Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-05/msg00155.html.
TIA
Dominique
Dear Dominique,
Without the patch applied, trunk shows 360 bytes definitely missing in
3 blocks for the original testcase and 9 out of 92 allocs did not have
corresponding frees. WIth the patch, I get:
==20527==
==20527== HEAP SUMMARY:
==20527== in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==20527==
