Hi!
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:59:27PM +0800, Xionghu Luo wrote:
> On 2021/9/4 05:44, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mbl fmod\M} } } */
> >>+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mbl fmodf\M} } } */
> >>+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mbl remainder\M} } }
On 2021/9/4 05:44, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:31:24AM +0800, Xionghu Luo wrote:
fmod/fmodf and remainder/remainderf could be expanded instead of library
call when fast-math build, which is much faster.
Thank you very much for this patch.
Some trivial
Hi!
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:31:24AM +0800, Xionghu Luo wrote:
> fmod/fmodf and remainder/remainderf could be expanded instead of library
> call when fast-math build, which is much faster.
Thank you very much for this patch.
Some trivial comments if you haven't commmitted it yet:
>
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 10:31 PM Xionghu Luo wrote:
>
> Resend the patch that addressed Will's comments.
>
>
> fmod/fmodf and remainder/remainderf could be expanded instead of library
> call when fast-math build, which is much faster.
>
> fmodf:
> fdivs f0,f1,f2
> frizf0,f0
>
Hi Xionghu,
This looks okay to me. Recommend maintainers approve.
Thanks!
Bill
On 9/2/21 9:31 PM, Xionghu Luo wrote:
Resend the patch that addressed Will's comments.
fmod/fmodf and remainder/remainderf could be expanded instead of library
call when fast-math build, which is much faster.
Resend the patch that addressed Will's comments.
fmod/fmodf and remainder/remainderf could be expanded instead of library
call when fast-math build, which is much faster.
fmodf:
fdivs f0,f1,f2
frizf0,f0
fnmsubs f1,f2,f0,f1
remainderf:
fdivs f0,f1,f2
frin
On 2021/7/10 02:40, will schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 09:44 +0800, Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Gentle ping ^2, thanks.
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568143.html
>>
>>
>> On 2021/5/14 15:13, Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> Test SPEC2017
On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 09:44 +0800, Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Gentle ping ^2, thanks.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568143.html
>
>
> On 2021/5/14 15:13, Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Test SPEC2017 Ofast P8LE for this patch : 511.povray_r +1.14%,
>
Gentle ping ^2, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568143.html
On 2021/5/14 15:13, Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches wrote:
Test SPEC2017 Ofast P8LE for this patch : 511.povray_r +1.14%,
526.blender_r +1.72%, no obvious changes to others.
On 2021/5/6 10:36, Xionghu Luo
Ping, thanks.
On 2021/5/14 15:13, Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches wrote:
Test SPEC2017 Ofast P8LE for this patch : 511.povray_r +1.14%,
526.blender_r +1.72%, no obvious changes to others.
On 2021/5/6 10:36, Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches wrote:
Gentle ping, thanks.
On 2021/4/16 15:10, Xiong Hu
10 matches
Mail list logo
