Re: Porting libsanitizer to Solaris

2014-07-25 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Konstantin Serebryany wrote: BTW, I really want to change our current scheme of merging sanitizer sources to gcc -- to use 'svn external' or some such instead of maintaining a copy. I believe we should avoid all use of systems such as svn externals or git submodules, so

Re: Porting libsanitizer to Solaris (Was: Re: [PATCH][Revised] Enable libsanitizer on darwin)

2014-07-04 Thread Konstantin Serebryany
Hi Rainer, All contributions to libsanitizer should go via LLVM repository. See https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/HowToContribute The smaller the patches the faster they will come through. If you can set up a public build bot it will *immensely* simplify many things. (see more

Re: Porting libsanitizer to Solaris

2014-07-04 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Konstantin, All contributions to libsanitizer should go via LLVM repository. See https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/HowToContribute The smaller the patches the faster they will come through. ok. I'll see how to split up the patches. Some parts are completely trivial in that

Re: Porting libsanitizer to Solaris

2014-07-04 Thread Konstantin Serebryany
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote: Hi Konstantin, All contributions to libsanitizer should go via LLVM repository. See https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/HowToContribute The smaller the patches the faster they will come through.