Jonathan Wakely writes:
> In order to follow the GCC coding style (a space between the function
> name and opening parenthesis) and to match the first example for
> __builtin_expect, I propose this patch instead:
>
> Index: extend.texi
> ===
rove example.
>
>
> Can I get approval to check this in to trunk?
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> ________________
>> From: Jonathan Wakely
>> To: Segher Boessenkool
>> Cc: james_av...@yahoo.com; g...@gcc.gnu.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, Dec
example.
Can I get approval to check this in to trunk?
>
>
>
> From: Jonathan Wakely
> To: Segher Boessenkool
> Cc: james_av...@yahoo.com; g...@gcc.gnu.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 5:22 AM
> Subject: Re: Possible wrong-way example
