Re: PowerPC: Use __float128 instead of __ieee128 in tests.

2020-11-12 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:44:09PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 01:26:32PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 06:12:31PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > > > Two of the tests used the __ieee128 keyword instead of __float128. This > > > patch ch

Re: PowerPC: Use __float128 instead of __ieee128 in tests.

2020-11-12 Thread Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 01:26:32PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 06:12:31PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > > Two of the tests used the __ieee128 keyword instead of __float128. This > > patch changes those cases to use the official keyword. > > What is "offi

Re: PowerPC: Use __float128 instead of __ieee128 in tests.

2020-11-12 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi, On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 06:12:31PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > Two of the tests used the __ieee128 keyword instead of __float128. This > patch changes those cases to use the official keyword. What is "official" about that? Why make this change at all? __ieee128 should work as well! D

Re: PowerPC: Use __float128 instead of __ieee128 in tests.

2020-10-26 Thread will schmidt via Gcc-patches
On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 18:12 -0400, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote: > PowerPC: Use __float128 instead of __ieee128 in tests. > > I have split all of these patches into separate patches to hopefully get them > into the tree. > > Two of the tests used the __ieee128

PowerPC: Use __float128 instead of __ieee128 in tests.

2020-10-22 Thread Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches
PowerPC: Use __float128 instead of __ieee128 in tests. I have split all of these patches into separate patches to hopefully get them into the tree. Two of the tests used the __ieee128 keyword instead of __float128. This patch changes those cases to use the official keyword. I have tested this