On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 07:24:02PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Looks good with those things tweaked.
Except that the patch chose the wrong section to emit the label,
because the decl is wrong. But of course I was using the same decl as
used in existing SHF_LINK_ORDER support, so it was
Hi!
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 12:19:50PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> --- a/gcc/varasm.c
> +++ b/gcc/varasm.c
> @@ -6866,6 +6866,26 @@ default_elf_asm_named_section (const char *name,
> unsigned int flags,
>*f = '\0';
> }
>
> + char func_label[256];
> + if (flags &
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 08:47:02AM -0500, will schmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-05-07 at 12:19 +0930, Alan Modra via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > --- a/gcc/varasm.c
> > +++ b/gcc/varasm.c
> > @@ -6866,6 +6866,26 @@ default_elf_asm_named_section (const char
> > *name, unsigned int flags,
> >*f =
On Fri, 2021-05-07 at 12:19 +0930, Alan Modra via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On PowerPC64 ELFv1 function symbols are defined on function
> descriptors in an .opd section rather than in the function code.
> .opd is not split up by the PowerPC64 backend for comdat groups or
> other situations where
On PowerPC64 ELFv1 function symbols are defined on function
descriptors in an .opd section rather than in the function code.
.opd is not split up by the PowerPC64 backend for comdat groups or
other situations where per-function sections are required. Thus
SECTION_LINK_ORDER can't use the function
