On 03/05/2024 15:45, Alex Coplan wrote:
> This fixes a typo in combine_reg_notes in the load/store pair fusion
> pass. As it stands, the calls to filter_notes store any
> REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR to fr_expr with the following association:
>
> - i2 -> fr_expr[0]
> - i1 -> fr_expr[1]
>
> but then
Christophe Lyon writes:
> Fix the comment to document FEATURE_STRING instead of FEAT_STRING.
>
> 2024-03-29 Christophe Lyon
>
> gcc/
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def: Fix comment.
OK, thanks.
Richard
> ---
> gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def | 16
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:58:53AM +, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> The patch to restructure builtin_reciprocals missed out an obvious ')'.
> Adjusted thusly and applied as obvious to trunk.
Sorry for that. Could you please also handle the gimple_call_internal_p
case, so that it actually
On 01/12/15 09:04, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:58:53AM +, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>> The patch to restructure builtin_reciprocals missed out an obvious ')'.
>> Adjusted thusly and applied as obvious to trunk.
>
> Sorry for that. Could you please also handle the
On 15/08/14 17:24, Evandro Menezes wrote:
I tripped at a typo that goes undetected because the macro NAMED_PARAM
doesn't apply in the absence of designated initializers.
Since struct scale_addr_mode_cost has the cost for DI, but not for QI, the
instances of struct cpu_addrcost_table are not
...@arm.com'
Subject: RE: [PATCH, AArch64] Fix typo
Ping, pretty please.
--
Evandro Menezes Austin, USA
e.mene...@samsung.com +1-512-425-3365
-Original Message-
From: Evandro Menezes [mailto:e.mene...@samsung.com]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 10:02
]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 14:40
To: 'James Greenhalgh'
Cc: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'; 'James Greenhalgh';
'richard.earns...@arm.com'; 'marcus.shawcr...@arm.com'
Subject: RE: [PATCH, AArch64] Fix typo
Ping, pretty please.
--
Evandro Menezes Austin, USA
e.mene
Greenhalgh; Richard Earnshaw; Marcus
Shawcroft; ram...@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, AArch64] Fix typo
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Evandro Menezes e.mene...@samsung.com wrote:
This is a trivial patch. However, without it, the addressing mode
cost is incorrectly calculated, since the cost
@gcc.gnu.org'; 'James Greenhalgh';
'richard.earns...@arm.com'; 'marcus.shawcr...@arm.com'
Subject: RE: [PATCH, AArch64] Fix typo
Ping.
--
Evandro Menezes Austin, USA
e.mene...@samsung.com +1-512-425-3365
-Original Message-
From: Evandro Menezes
'; 'James Greenhalgh';
'richard.earns...@arm.com'; 'marcus.shawcr...@arm.com'
Subject: RE: [PATCH, AArch64] Fix typo
Thanks for the review.
--
Evandro Menezes Austin, USA
e.mene...@samsung.com +1-512-425-3365
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 05:24:58PM +0100, Evandro Menezes wrote:
I tripped at a typo that goes undetected because the macro NAMED_PARAM
doesn't apply in the absence of designated initializers.
Since struct scale_addr_mode_cost has the cost for DI, but not for QI, the
instances of struct
, 2014 11:36
To: Evandro Menezes
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; 'James Greenhalgh'; richard.earns...@arm.com;
marcus.shawcr...@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, AArch64] Fix typo
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 05:24:58PM +0100, Evandro Menezes wrote:
I tripped at a typo that goes undetected because the macro
12 matches
Mail list logo
