Hi Tobias,
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 16:04:51, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> Hi Tobias,
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:37:46, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> Hmm,
>>
>> I was hoping somehow that only that test case is broken,
>> and needs to be fixed. Th
Hi Tobias,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:37:46, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hmm,
>
> I was hoping somehow that only that test case is broken,
> and needs to be fixed. The target attribute is somehow simple,
> it implies intent(in) and the actu
Hi Tobias,
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:37:46, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> Hi Bernd,
>
> Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> It was caused by a strict aliasing violation, when passing a value of the
>> type
>> "class(x),pointer" to a formal procedure parameter of the type
>> "class(x),target".
>
> I assume a VIEW_C
Hi Bernd,
Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> It was caused by a strict aliasing violation, when passing a value of the type
> "class(x),pointer" to a formal procedure parameter of the type
> "class(x),target".
I assume a VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR is directly on the argument is insufficient?
Otherwise,
I think I w
