Re: [PATCH][GCC/TESTSUITE] Make test for traditional-cpp depend on

2016-11-16 Thread Mike Stump
On Nov 16, 2016, at 10:58 AM, Mike Stump wrote: > > Yeah, I easily could have approved it as well, so no worries. Oh. I see I did approve the original patch, sorry for not catching it. Thanks for all your work.

Re: [PATCH][GCC/TESTSUITE] Make test for traditional-cpp depend on

2016-11-16 Thread Mike Stump
On Nov 16, 2016, at 7:57 AM, Tamar Christina wrote: > > Forgot to include the committed patch. >>> This is causing all test names to depend on $srcdir. A test name >>> should never include the value of $srcdir. >> >> Sorry about that, committed a fix as r242500 under the obvious rule. Yeah, I

RE: [PATCH][GCC/TESTSUITE] Make test for traditional-cpp depend on

2016-11-16 Thread Tamar Christina
Forgot to include the committed patch. > -Original Message- > From: Tamar Christina > Sent: 16 November 2016 15:55 > To: Andreas Schwab; Mike Stump > Cc: GCC Patches; r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de; nd > Subject: RE: [PATCH][GCC/TESTSUITE] Make test for tradition

RE: [PATCH][GCC/TESTSUITE] Make test for traditional-cpp depend on

2016-11-16 Thread Tamar Christina
> > This is causing all test names to depend on $srcdir. A test name should never > include the value of $srcdir. Sorry about that, committed a fix as r242500 under the obvious rule. Thanks, Tamar > > Andreas. > > -- > Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 > BA

Re: [PATCH][GCC/TESTSUITE] Make test for traditional-cpp depend on

2016-11-16 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Nov 07 2016, Mike Stump wrote: > On Nov 1, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Tamar Christina wrote: >> >> A glibc update recently broke this test by adding a CPP >> macro that uses the ## string function which traditional-cpp >> does not support. >> The change in glibc that made the test fail is from >> 696

RE: [PATCH][GCC/TESTSUITE] Make test for traditional-cpp depend on

2016-11-08 Thread Tamar Christina
> Can you remove the comment: Newlib uses ## when including stdlib.h as of > 2007-09-07. while you are at it? I think it doesn't make any sense post the > change unless one reads history. > No problem, Thanks > > 2016-10-31 Tamar Christina > > > > PR testsuite/78136 > > * gcc.dg/cpp

Re: [PATCH][GCC/TESTSUITE] Make test for traditional-cpp depend on

2016-11-07 Thread Mike Stump
On Nov 1, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Tamar Christina wrote: > > A glibc update recently broke this test by adding a CPP > macro that uses the ## string function which traditional-cpp > does not support. > The change in glibc that made the test fail is from > 6962682ffe5e5f0373047a0b894fee7a774be254. > >

Re: [PATCH][GCC/TESTSUITE] Make test for traditional-cpp depend on

2016-11-07 Thread Tamar Christina
Ping. From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org on behalf of Tamar Christina Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 3:46:07 PM To: GCC Patches; r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de; mikest...@comcast.net Cc: nd Subject: [PATCH][GCC/TESTSUITE] Make test for traditional-cpp d