, 2018 18:03
> To: Tamar Christina
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; James Greenhalgh
> ; Richard Earnshaw
> ; Marcus Shawcroft
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][GCC][AArch64] Updated stack-clash implementation
> supporting 64k probes. [patch (1/6)]
>
> On 07/16/2018 07:54 AM,
On 07/25/2018 05:09 AM, Tamar Christina wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Attached is an updated patch that clarifies some of the comments in the patch
> and adds comments to the individual testcases
> as requested.
>
> Ok for trunk?
>
> Thanks,
> Tamar
>
> gcc/
> 2018-07-25 Jeff Law
> Richard
ar Christina
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; James Greenhalgh
> ; Richard Earnshaw
> ; Marcus Shawcroft
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][GCC][AArch64] Updated stack-clash implementation
> supporting 64k probes. [patch (1/6)]
>
> On 07/25/2018 05:09 AM, Tamar Christina wrote
On 07/11/2018 05:20 AM, Tamar Christina wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This patch implements the use of the stack clash mitigation for aarch64.
> In Aarch64 we expect both the probing interval and the guard size to be 64KB
> and we enforce them to always be equal.
>
> We also probe up by 1024 bytes in the
On 07/11/2018 05:20 AM, Tamar Christina wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This patch implements the use of the stack clash mitigation for aarch64.
> In Aarch64 we expect both the probing interval and the guard size to be 64KB
> and we enforce them to always be equal.
>
> We also probe up by 1024 bytes in the
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the review!
The 07/11/2018 18:30, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/11/2018 05:20 AM, Tamar Christina wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This patch implements the use of the stack clash mitigation for aarch64.
> > In Aarch64 we expect both the probing interval and the guard size to be 64KB
> >
hristina
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 18:40
> To: Jeff Law
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; James Greenhalgh
> ; Richard Earnshaw
> ; Marcus Shawcroft
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][GCC][AArch64] Updated stack-clash implementation
> supporting 64k probes. [patch (1/6)]
On 07/12/2018 11:39 AM, Tamar Christina wrote:
>>> +
>>> + /* Round size to the nearest multiple of guard_size, and calculate the
>>> + residual as the difference between the original size and the rounded
>>> + size. */
>>> + HOST_WIDE_INT rounded_size = size & -guard_size;
>>> + HOST_WI
The 07/13/2018 17:46, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/12/2018 11:39 AM, Tamar Christina wrote:
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Round size to the nearest multiple of guard_size, and calculate the
> >>> + residual as the difference between the original size and the rounded
> >>> + size. */
> >>> + HOST_WIDE_INT
On 07/16/2018 07:54 AM, Tamar Christina wrote:
> The 07/13/2018 17:46, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 07/12/2018 11:39 AM, Tamar Christina wrote:
> +
> + /* Round size to the nearest multiple of guard_size, and calculate the
> + residual as the difference between the original size and the r
10 matches
Mail list logo
