On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:55 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:51 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:34 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Jeff Law wrote:
OK with the appropropriate ChangeLog entires. THe original for
ira-costs.c was fine, so you just need the trivi
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:51 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:34 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
>>> Jeff Law wrote:
>>> OK with the appropropriate ChangeLog entires. THe original for
>>> ira-costs.c was fine, so you just need the trivial one for the testcase.
>>
>> ChangeLog below - Jiong
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:34 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
>> Jeff Law wrote:
>> OK with the appropropriate ChangeLog entires. THe original for
>> ira-costs.c was fine, so you just need the trivial one for the testcase.
>
> ChangeLog below - Jiong, could you commit for me please?
>
> 2014-12-02 Wilco
> Jeff Law wrote:
> OK with the appropropriate ChangeLog entires. THe original for
> ira-costs.c was fine, so you just need the trivial one for the testcase.
ChangeLog below - Jiong, could you commit for me please?
2014-12-02 Wilco Dijkstra
* gcc/ira-costs.c (scan_one_insn): Improve
On 11/28/14 07:10, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Jeff Law wrote:
Do you have a testcase that shows the expected improvements from this
change? It's OK if it's specific to a target.
Have you bootstrapped and regression tested this change?
With a test for the testsuite and assuming it passes bootstrap a
> Jeff Law wrote:
> Do you have a testcase that shows the expected improvements from this
> change? It's OK if it's specific to a target.
>
> Have you bootstrapped and regression tested this change?
>
> With a test for the testsuite and assuming it passes bootstrap and
> regression testing, this
On 10/29/14 07:21, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
This patch adjusts the spill cost of literal pool loads to reduce the chance of
them being
caller-saved (which is inefficient). Such loads should be rematerialized and
thus should not include
the cost of a spill store. This was done only on constants for