Re: [PATCH] PR67518 and PR53852 -- add testcase.

2015-11-08 Thread Andre Vehreschild
Hi Paul, I fell for the same issue. You need a more recent isl library then 0.14.2. I installed 0.12.something when I started gfortran hacking and didn't upgrade since. You can get the ISL lib from: ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ or from your distribution (Fedora 21 is shipping

Re: [PATCH] PR67518 and PR53852 -- add testcase.

2015-11-08 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Dear Joost, These cause regressions on my tree: f951: sorry, unimplemented: Graphite loop optimizations cannot be used (ISL is not available)(-fgraphite, -fgraphite-identity, -floop-block, -floop-interchange, -floop-strip-mine, -floop-parallelize-all, -floop-unroll-and-jam, and

RE: [PATCH] PR67518 and PR53852 -- add testcase.

2015-11-08 Thread VandeVondele Joost
r229967 2015-11-08 Joost VandeVondele * gfortran.dg/PR67518.f90: move from here... * gfortran.dg/graphite/PR67518.f90: to here. * gfortran.dg/PR53852.f90: move from here... * gfortran.dg/graphite/PR53852.f90: to here.

RE: [PATCH] PR67518 and PR53852 -- add testcase.

2015-11-08 Thread VandeVondele Joost
I see, graphite is optional. Trying to find the dejagnu-ery, I think the obvious thing is to move the tests from gfortran.dg/ to gfortran.dg/graphite/ I'll do that under the obvious rule, unless this get's preapproved before that ...

Re: [PATCH] PR67518 and PR53852 -- add testcase.

2015-11-06 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Dear Joost, These two testcases look fine to me. PR53852 is marked as being a 4.9,5,6 regression. If I have understood correctly, it has only been fixed on trunk. Do you know if there is any intention to fix it on the other branches? OK for trunk and, subject to the previous question being

RE: [PATCH] PR67518 and PR53852 -- add testcase.

2015-11-06 Thread VandeVondele Joost
Thanks Paul. I believe PR53852 won't be fixed on 4.9/5 as it seems to depend on the recent graphite cleanup work and recent isl. As such I'll commit to trunk only.

RE: [PATCH] PR67518 and PR53852 -- add testcase.

2015-11-05 Thread VandeVondele Joost
> Attached testcases for two previously fixed PRs (and thanks to Dominique who > was quicker for PR67982). ping ?