On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> Apologies as before on slowness. This looks trivially OK to me but that's
> thanks to the description, much appreciated.
You are welcome, that just means I did my homework right.
> OK for commit but adding RMs given the imminent release.
Applied
Maciej Rozycki writes:
> (we have no support for hard-float n64 MIPS16 code generation), which
> means that the test case will fail, as the regular expression pattern
> expects `lw' and `.word' rather than `ld' and `.dword' respectively to
> appear in assembly code