Re: [PATCH libatomic/arm] avoid warning on constant addresses (PR 101379)

On 7/21/21 10:41 AM, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote: -Original Message- From: Gcc-patches On Behalf Of Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches Sent: 10 July 2021 00:11 To: gcc-patches ; Christophe Lyon Subject: [PATCH libatomic/arm] avoid warning on constant addresses (PR 101379) The attached tweak avoi

RE: [PATCH libatomic/arm] avoid warning on constant addresses (PR 101379)

> -Original Message- > From: Gcc-patches bounces+kyrylo.tkachov=arm@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf Of Martin Sebor > via Gcc-patches > Sent: 10 July 2021 00:11 > To: gcc-patches ; Christophe Lyon > > Subject: [PATCH libatomic/arm] avoid warning on constant addresses (PR > 101379) > > The a

Re: [PATCH libatomic/arm] avoid warning on constant addresses (PR 101379)

Hi! On 2021-07-16T15:11:24-0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: > On 7/16/21 11:42 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> On 2021-07-09T17:11:25-0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches >> wrote: >>> The attached tweak avoids the new -Warray-bounds instances when >>> building libatomic for arm. Christop

Re: [PATCH libatomic/arm] avoid warning on constant addresses (PR 101379)

On 16/07/2021 18:42, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Of course, we may simply re-work the libgomp/GCN code -- but don't we first need to answer the question whether the current code is actually "bad"? Aren't we going to get a lot of similar reports from kernel/embedded/other low-level software developers

Re: [PATCH libatomic/arm] avoid warning on constant addresses (PR 101379)

On 7/16/21 11:42 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi Martin! On 2021-07-09T17:11:25-0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: The attached tweak avoids the new -Warray-bounds instances when building libatomic for arm. Christophe confirms it resolves the problem (thank you!) As Abid has just repor

Re: [PATCH libatomic/arm] avoid warning on constant addresses (PR 101379)

Hi Martin! On 2021-07-09T17:11:25-0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: > The attached tweak avoids the new -Warray-bounds instances when > building libatomic for arm. Christophe confirms it resolves > the problem (thank you!) As Abid has just reported in

Re: [PATCH libatomic/arm] avoid warning on constant addresses (PR 101379)

Hi, On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 1:11 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches < gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > The attached tweak avoids the new -Warray-bounds instances when > building libatomic for arm. Christophe confirms it resolves > the problem (thank you!) > > As we have discussed, the main goal of