For conversion API, I would prefer kito review since I am not sure about this
stuff.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: pan2.li
Date: 2023-08-15 10:55
To: gcc-patches
CC: juzhe.zhong; pan2.li; yanzhang.wang; kito.cheng
Subject: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Support RVV VFCVT.X.F.V rounding mode intrinsic API
Fr
Just a random idea came to my mind, maybe we could introduce one more
template argument to reduce those codes for rounding mode intrinsic
stuff?
example:
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins-bases.cc
b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins-bases.cc
index 2074dac0f16..9cc60842a5b 1
:
+ bool has_rounding_mode_operand_p () const override { return true; }
+};
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Kito Cheng
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2023 11:34 PM
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Cc: Li, Pan2 ; gcc-patches ; Wang,
Yanzhang
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Support RVV VFCVT.X.F.V rounding mode intrinsic
Or using an enum value rather than bool?
I am thinking we could also simplify/remove most other frm classes,
some practical example:
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins-bases.cc
b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins-bases.cc
index 2074dac0f16..ace63e963a5 100644
--- a/gcc/conf
-
From: Kito Cheng
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 11:30 AM
To: Li, Pan2
Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; gcc-patches ; Wang, Yanzhang
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Support RVV VFCVT.X.F.V rounding mode intrinsic
API
Or using an enum value rather than bool?
I am thinking we could also simplify/remove
Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; gcc-patches ; Wang,
> Yanzhang
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Support RVV VFCVT.X.F.V rounding mode
> intrinsic API
>
> Or using an enum value rather than bool?
>
> I am thinking we could also simplify/remove most other frm classes,
> som
16, 2023 11:30 AM
> To: Li, Pan2
> Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; gcc-patches ; Wang,
> Yanzhang
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Support RVV VFCVT.X.F.V rounding mode
> intrinsic API
>
> Or using an enum value rather than bool?
>
> I am thinking we could also simplify/r
