Steve Ellcey steve.ell...@imgtec.com writes:
On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 02:14 -0700, Matthew Fortune wrote:
Hi Steve,
Overall, I don't think these optimizations are ready to include. In
principle
the idea looks good but it is done at the wrong point in the compiler in my
opinion.
The
On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 02:14 -0700, Matthew Fortune wrote:
Hi Steve,
Overall, I don't think these optimizations are ready to include. In principle
the idea looks good but it is done at the wrong point in the compiler in my
opinion.
The biggest concern I have is that the analysis should be
Hi Steve,
Overall, I don't think these optimizations are ready to include. In principle
the idea looks good but it is done at the wrong point in the compiler in my
opinion.
The biggest concern I have is that the analysis should be possible at (or
prior to) the point where the prologue/epilogue
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 00:32 +, Joseph Myers wrote:
New command-line options need documenting in invoke.texi.
Good point, thanks for catching that. Here is an updated patch with
invoke.texi. There are no other changes to the patch.
Steve Ellcey
sell...@imgtec.com
2015-07-31 Steve
New command-line options need documenting in invoke.texi.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
