Re: [Patch, test] Enable to prune warnings for tests defined in one exp file

2012-10-10 Thread Eric Botcazou
> 2012-08-27 Terry Guo > > * lib/gcc-dg.exp (dg_runtest_extra_prunes): New variable to define > rules > that will be applied to all tests in a .exp file. > (gcc-dg-prune): Include rules defined by the above variable. > > * gcc.target/arm/arm.exp (dg_runtest_extr

RE: [Patch, test] Enable to prune warnings for tests defined in one exp file

2012-10-10 Thread Terry Guo
> -Original Message- > From: Eric Botcazou [mailto:ebotca...@adacore.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 3:56 PM > To: Terry Guo > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Guenther > Subject: Re: [Patch, test] Enable to prune warnings for tests defined > in one ex

Re: [Patch, test] Enable to prune warnings for tests defined in one exp file

2012-08-27 Thread Mike Stump
On Aug 27, 2012, at 1:14 AM, Terry Guo wrote: > This patch intends to provide a chance to prune common warning messages for > tests defined in an exp file. > Is it OK to trunk? Ok. If you can find where to document this... :-) That'd be nice.

RE: [Patch, test] Enable to prune warnings for tests defined in one exp file

2012-08-29 Thread Terry Guo
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Stump [mailto:mikest...@comcast.net] > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 1:21 AM > To: Terry Guo > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Guenther > Subject: Re: [Patch, test] Enable to prune warnings for tests defined > in one exp file >

[Ping]RE: [Patch, test] Enable to prune warnings for tests defined in one exp file

2012-09-03 Thread Terry Guo
: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Guenther > Subject: RE: [Patch, test] Enable to prune warnings for tests defined > in one exp file > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mike Stump [mailto:mikest...@comcast.net] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 1:21 AM > &

Re: [Ping]RE: [Patch, test] Enable to prune warnings for tests defined in one exp file

2012-09-04 Thread Mike Stump
On Sep 3, 2012, at 11:05 PM, Terry Guo wrote: > Is it ok to document this feature in README.gcc? Sure. I was almost hoping someone had a pointer to a wiki page that had new bits... > Is it ok to back port this feature to 4.7 branch? Ok.