I intend to look at this once we're back in development stage 1 (for GCC
4.9).
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
@gcc.gnu.org'
Subject: RE: [PING^2]RE: [PING] RE: [Ping]FW: [PATCH] Cilk Plus merging to
trunk (2 of n)
I intend to look at this once we're back in development stage 1 (for GCC 4.9).
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
I have other patches that are also part of Cilk Plus. Can I send
them out now also?
You can send them, but I don't propose to review them outside stage 1
(clearly such major new features are only suitable for mainline commit in
stage 1), and
: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [Ping]FW: [PATCH] Cilk Plus merging to trunk (2 of n)
Hello Joseph,
Here is the fixed patch with all your changes and the ChangeLog
entries below.
gcc/ChangeLog
2012-11-05 Balaji V. Iyer balaji.v.i...@intel.com
* Makefile.in
.
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 5:38 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: Richard Guenther; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [Ping]FW: [PATCH] Cilk Plus merging to trunk (2 of n)
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Iyer, Balaji V wrote
Subject: RE: [Ping]FW: [PATCH] Cilk Plus merging to trunk (2 of n)
Hello Joseph,
Here is the fixed patch with all your changes and the ChangeLog entries
below.
gcc/ChangeLog
2012-11-05 Balaji V. Iyer balaji.v.i...@intel.com
* Makefile.in (C_COMMON_OBJS): Added c-family
Guenther; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [Ping]FW: [PATCH] Cilk Plus merging to trunk (2 of n)
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Here is a link to the latest spec. This should clear several of
the questions you are seeking.
(http://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/m
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Where in the patch you use int for the size of something (e.g. a list) on
the host,
please use size_t.
Can you please give me an example where I am violating this rule? Here
is a link to the last submitted patch in case you need it
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Here is a link to the latest spec. This should clear several of the
questions you are seeking.
(http://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/m/4/e/7/3/1/40297-
Intel_Cilk_plus_lang_spec_2.htm#array)
This specification is much improved, especially as
@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [Ping]FW: [PATCH] Cilk Plus merging to trunk (2 of n)
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Here is a link to the latest spec. This should clear several of
the questions you are seeking.
(http://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/m/4/e/7/3/1/40297
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com wrote:
Hi Joseph,
Did you get a chance to look at this submission? I think I have fixed
all the changes you have mentioned. Is it OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Did you get a chance to look at this submission? I think I have
fixed all the changes you have mentioned. Is it OK for trunk?
I expect to look at the revised specification and patch later this month.
My initial impression from a glance at the
Hello Joseph,
Please see my responses below:
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 7:45 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Ping]FW: [PATCH] Cilk Plus merging to trunk (2 of n)
On Thu, 4 Oct
13 matches
Mail list logo
