> I personally don't like much this pattern of saving a variable, doing
> something and then restoring it.
Right, it's kludgy, so I have only changed the location in the end.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on all active branches as obvious.
2014-07-19 Eric Botcazou
* toplev.c
On 12 July 2014 03:39, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Your patch hides the caret but the location still points to the
>> closing brace (so if you use an IDE like emacs this is where you will
>> go).
>>
>> Is there a location for the definition? Could we store/pass one to this
>> point?
>>
>> Otherwise, w
> Your patch hides the caret but the location still points to the
> closing brace (so if you use an IDE like emacs this is where you will
> go).
>
> Is there a location for the definition? Could we store/pass one to this
> point?
>
> Otherwise, would it be appropriate to point to the declaration
> since displaying the caret was made the default, the -Wstack-usage warning has
> a strange-looking final part:
>
> stack-usage-2.c: In function 'foo2':
> stack-usage-2.c:16:1: warning: stack usage is 920 bytes [-Wstack-usage=]
> }
> ^
Your patch hides the caret but the location still points to
