Richard Sandiford writes:
> vect_recog_divmod_pattern currently bails out if the target has
> native support for integer division, but I think in practice
> it's always going to be better to open-code it anyway, just as
> we usually open-code scalar divisions by constants.
>
> I think the only cu
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 2:52 PM Richard Sandiford <
richard.sandif...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:31 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 09:21:35AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> > vect_recog_divmod_pattern currently bails out
Richard Biener writes:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:31 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 09:21:35AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> > vect_recog_divmod_pattern currently bails out if the target has
>> > native support for integer division, but I think in practice
>> > it's alw
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:31 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 09:21:35AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > vect_recog_divmod_pattern currently bails out if the target has
> > native support for integer division, but I think in practice
> > it's always going to be better to ope
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 09:21:35AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> vect_recog_divmod_pattern currently bails out if the target has
> native support for integer division, but I think in practice
> it's always going to be better to open-code it anyway, just as
> we usually open-code scalar division
