On 25/01/17 10:28, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Richard, Hi Ramana,
>
> The patch below is a simple fix for PR0. I am not really
> expecting you to agree with it, but I thought that it was worth
> posting so that this PR could be looked at again and maybe a better
> patch found. (Plus I
Hi Richard, Hi Ramana,
The patch below is a simple fix for PR0. I am not really
expecting you to agree with it, but I thought that it was worth
posting so that this PR could be looked at again and maybe a better
patch found. (Plus I am trying to close PRs so that the gcc 7 branch
w
