On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> Michael Matz writes:
Trever Saunders writes:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > Btw, I've come around multiple coding-styles in the pa
Richard Biener writes:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Michael Matz writes:
>>>Trever Saunders writes:
Richard Biener writes:
> Btw, I've come around multiple coding-styles in the past and I
> definitely would prefer m_mode / m_count to mark mem
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Michael Matz writes:
>>Trever Saunders writes:
>>> Richard Biener writes:
>>> > Btw, I've come around multiple coding-styles in the past and I
>>> > definitely would prefer m_mode / m_count to mark members vs. mode_ and
>>> > count_.
Michael Matz writes:
>Trever Saunders writes:
>> Richard Biener writes:
>> > Btw, I've come around multiple coding-styles in the past and I
>> > definitely would prefer m_mode / m_count to mark members vs. mode_ and
>> > count_. (and s_XXX for static members IIRC).
>>
>> I'd prefer m_/s_foo fo
