On Tue, 31 May 2011, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Gah, seems like I'd forgotten the "no subclasses" bit by the time
> I started looking at code. Sorry for the false alarm.
Still, the extra look made me realise that I should have
restricted that statement to allocatable registers.
(And I really do
Hans-Peter Nilsson writes:
> On Tue, 31 May 2011, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Hans-Peter Nilsson writes:
>> > Index: tm.texi.in
>> > ===
>> > --- tm.texi.in (revision 174376)
>> > +++ tm.texi.in (working copy)
>> > @@ -2327,6
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Hans-Peter Nilsson writes:
> > Index: tm.texi.in
> > ===
> > --- tm.texi.in (revision 174376)
> > +++ tm.texi.in (working copy)
> > @@ -2327,6 +2327,11 @@ constraints is throu
Hans-Peter Nilsson writes:
> Index: tm.texi.in
> ===
> --- tm.texi.in(revision 174376)
> +++ tm.texi.in(working copy)
> @@ -2327,6 +2327,11 @@ constraints is through machine-dependent
> You can define such letters to
On Sat, 28 May 2011, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> +You must define the narrowest register class for a register so that
> +class either has no subclasses, or that for some mode, the move cost
> +between registers within the class are cheaper than moving a register
Bah: "is cheaper" is the grammatica
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 04:47 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 May 2011, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> > It sounds like you're saying that "the narrowest register
> > classes must be formed of registers for which there are trivial
> > instructions to mov
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> Good, a way forward (well, for me) even though the cure is
> suspiciously incidental. Thanks for your patience.
JFTR, setting CRIS_CC0_REGNUM to fixed just moves the assert to
trig at the same place in the v10 multilib, where
CRIS_MOF_REGNUM is ava
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 04:47 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 May 2011, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> > It sounds like you're saying that "the narrowest register
> > classes must be formed of registers for which there are trivial
> > instructions to mov
On 05/26/2011 04:47 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On 11-05-25 6:58 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
This patch solves http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154 for
CRIS.
The problem was in that the
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 11-05-25 6:58 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 May 2011, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> >
> > > This patch solves http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154 for
> > > CRIS.
> > > The problem was in that the pressure classes did not con
On 11-05-25 6:58 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
This patch solves http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154 for CRIS.
The problem was in that the pressure classes did not contain SRP register and
the assert failed.
I'm not sure I understand t
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> This patch solves http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154 for CRIS.
> The problem was in that the pressure classes did not contain SRP register and
> the assert failed.
I'm not sure I understand the basic requirement.
> OK to commit?
>
> 2
This patch solves http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154 for
CRIS. The problem was in that the pressure classes did not contain SRP
register and the assert failed.
OK to commit?
2011-05-25 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/49154
* config/cris/cris.h (reg_class
13 matches
Mail list logo
