Andrew Pinski writes:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> One of the more unfortunate things MIPS has inherited is an LP64 ABI
>> that uses 32-bit rather than 64-bit ELF. I've no idea how many people
>> use it these days (if anyone), but it happens to the ABI of the
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> One of the more unfortunate things MIPS has inherited is an LP64 ABI
> that uses 32-bit rather than 64-bit ELF. I've no idea how many people
> use it these days (if anyone), but it happens to the ABI of the MIPS
> primary target, mipsisa
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> "H.J. Lu" writes:
>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> I realise it's a bit clunky, but is the attached patch OK?
>>> Tested on mipsisa64-elf, where it restores the build, and on
>>> x86_64-linux-gnu.
>>>
"H.J. Lu" writes:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> I realise it's a bit clunky, but is the attached patch OK?
>> Tested on mipsisa64-elf, where it restores the build, and on
>> x86_64-linux-gnu.
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> gcc/
>> * dwarf2out.c (mem_loc_descripto
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> One of the more unfortunate things MIPS has inherited is an LP64 ABI
> that uses 32-bit rather than 64-bit ELF. I've no idea how many people
> use it these days (if anyone), but it happens to the ABI of the MIPS
> primary target, mipsisa
One of the more unfortunate things MIPS has inherited is an LP64 ABI
that uses 32-bit rather than 64-bit ELF. I've no idea how many people
use it these days (if anyone), but it happens to the ABI of the MIPS
primary target, mipsisa64-elf.
Because we're using 32-bit ELF, DWARF2_ADDR_SIZE is 4 rath
