On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:39:06PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >So I tried out the patch below. It decreases code size on most targets
> >(mostly fixed length insn targets), and increases it a small bit on some
> >variable length insn targets (doing an op twice, instead of doing it once
> >and
Hi Segher,
On 17/06/16 01:07, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:20:22AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
With the proposed cost change for vector construction we will end up
vectorizing the testcase in PR68961 again (on x86_64 and likely
on ppc64le as well after that target gets
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:20:22AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> With the proposed cost change for vector construction we will end up
> vectorizing the testcase in PR68961 again (on x86_64 and likely
> on ppc64le as well after that target gets adjustments). Currently
> we can't optimize that away
