Re: RFC: Monitoring old PRs, new dg directives [v2]

2020-11-10 Thread Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 03:15:00PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > On 2020-08-10T17:30:21-0400, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches > wrote: > > This patch adds a new DejaGNU directive, dg-ice, as outlined in the > > proposal here: > >

Re: RFC: Monitoring old PRs, new dg directives [v2]

2020-11-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2020-08-10T17:30:21-0400, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote: > This patch adds a new DejaGNU directive, dg-ice, as outlined in the > proposal here: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/550913.html > > It means that it's expected that the compiler crashes with an

Re: RFC: Monitoring old PRs, new dg directives [v2]

2020-08-10 Thread Mike Stump via Gcc-patches
On Aug 10, 2020, at 2:30 PM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Thanks a lot. Here's the latest version of my patch, which only adds dg-ice > at this point. > > So, um, OK? Ok.

Re: RFC: Monitoring old PRs, new dg directives [v2]

2020-08-10 Thread Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 09:48:06AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches writes: > >> > > sure. > >> > > * develop patch > >> > > * run testsuite > >> > > * observe unexpected ICEs > >> > > * load g++.log into editor > >> > > * ^sinternal comp > >> > > * gets to first