Re: [PATCH, Pointer Bounds Checker 35/x] Fix object size emitted for structures with flexible arrays

2014-06-16 Thread Ilya Enkovich
2014-06-13 19:40 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law : > On 06/12/14 17:38, Ilya Enkovich wrote: >>> >>> It looks ok to me - did you test with all languages? In particular did >>> you test Ada? >> >> >> I configure compiler with no language disabling and then run bootstrap >> and make check. Does it mean all langu

Re: [PATCH, Pointer Bounds Checker 35/x] Fix object size emitted for structures with flexible arrays

2014-06-13 Thread Jeff Law
On 06/12/14 17:38, Ilya Enkovich wrote: It looks ok to me - did you test with all languages? In particular did you test Ada? I configure compiler with no language disabling and then run bootstrap and make check. Does it mean all languages are covered? Will make more testing if required. In add

Re: [PATCH, Pointer Bounds Checker 35/x] Fix object size emitted for structures with flexible arrays

2014-06-13 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote: > 2014-06-12 11:55 GMT+04:00 Richard Biener : >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Ilya Enkovich >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This patch fixes problem with size emitted for static structures with >>> flexible array. I found a couple of trackers

Re: [PATCH, Pointer Bounds Checker 35/x] Fix object size emitted for structures with flexible arrays

2014-06-12 Thread Ilya Enkovich
2014-06-12 11:55 GMT+04:00 Richard Biener : > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This patch fixes problem with size emitted for static structures with >> flexible array. I found a couple of trackers in guzilla for this problem >> but all of them are marked as fix

Re: [PATCH, Pointer Bounds Checker 35/x] Fix object size emitted for structures with flexible arrays

2014-06-12 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote: > Hi, > > This patch fixes problem with size emitted for static structures with > flexible array. I found a couple of trackers in guzilla for this problem but > all of them are marked as fixed and problem still exists. > > For a simple testc