On 10 Oct 21:20, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2014-10-10 20:45 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> > On 10/09/14 10:54, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Ilya Enkovich
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It appeared I changed a semantics of BNDMK expand when replaced tree
> >>> operations with rtl one
2014-10-10 20:45 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> On 10/09/14 10:54, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Ilya Enkovich
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It appeared I changed a semantics of BNDMK expand when replaced tree
>>> operations with rtl ones.
>>>
>>> Original code:
>>>
>>> + op1 = expand_
On 10/09/14 10:54, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
It appeared I changed a semantics of BNDMK expand when replaced tree operations
with rtl ones.
Original code:
+ op1 = expand_normal (fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (arg1),
+
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> It appeared I changed a semantics of BNDMK expand when replaced tree
> operations with rtl ones.
>
> Original code:
>
> + op1 = expand_normal (fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (arg1),
> + arg1, inte
It appeared I changed a semantics of BNDMK expand when replaced tree operations
with rtl ones.
Original code:
+ op1 = expand_normal (fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (arg1),
+ arg1, integer_minus_one_node));
+ op1 = force_reg (Pmode, op1);
Modifi
On 18 Sep 19:33, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your comments. Below is a fixed verison.
> >
> > Ilya
> > --
>
> OK with a few nits below.
>
> Thanks,
> Uros.
>
> > +
> > +case IX86_BUILTIN_BNDRET:
> > + arg0 = CALL_EXPR_AR
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> Thanks for your comments. Below is a fixed verison.
>
> Ilya
> --
> 2014-09-17 Ilya Enkovich
>
> * config/i386/i386-builtin-types.def (BND): New.
> (ULONG): New.
> (BND_FTYPE_PCVOID_ULONG): New.
> (VOID_FT
On 17 Sep 20:06, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>
> >> >> I don't like the way arguments are prepared. For the case above,
> >> >> bnd_ldx should have index_register_operand predicate in its pattern,
> >> >> and this predicate (and its mode) should be c
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> >> I don't like the way arguments are prepared. For the case above,
>> >> bnd_ldx should have index_register_operand predicate in its pattern,
>> >> and this predicate (and its mode) should be checked in the expander
>> >> code. There are m
On 17 Sep 11:42, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Ilya Enkovich
> wrote:
> > On 16 Sep 12:02, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >>
> >> Hm, can this patch be compiled as part of the series? The expanders
> >> refer to various gen_bnd patterns that I don't see. Also, I don't see
> >> BND
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> On 16 Sep 12:02, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> Hm, can this patch be compiled as part of the series? The expanders
>> refer to various gen_bnd patterns that I don't see. Also, I don't see
>> BND mode introduced.
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch from t
On 16 Sep 12:02, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> Hm, can this patch be compiled as part of the series? The expanders
> refer to various gen_bnd patterns that I don't see. Also, I don't see
> BND mode introduced.
Hi,
Here is a patch from the series that introduces modes and instructions:
https://gcc.gnu.
> 2014-06-11 Ilya Enkovich
>
> * config/i386/i386-builtin-types.def (BND): New.
> (ULONG): New.
> (BND_FTYPE_PCVOID_ULONG): New.
> (VOID_FTYPE_BND_PCVOID): New.
> (VOID_FTYPE_PCVOID_PCVOID_BND): New.
> (BND_FTYPE_PCVOID_PCVOID): New.
> (BND
Ping
2014-06-11 17:58 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich :
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds i386 target builtins for Pointer Bounds Checker.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
>
> Thanks,
> Ilya
> --
> gcc/
>
> 2014-06-11 Ilya Enkovich
>
> * config/i386/i386-builtin-types.def (BND): New.
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
