Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg00040.html
Andrew, do you have any objections to this version?
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 01/11/16 15:21, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 31/10/16 11:54, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 24/10/16 17:15, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Kyrill
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Ping.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg00040.html
>
> Andrew, do you have any objections to this version?
Not really.
Thanks,
Andrew
> Thanks,
> Kyrill
>
> On 01/11/16 15:21, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 31/10/16 11:54
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 10/11/16 09:08, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg00040.html
Andrew, do you have any objections to this version?
Not really.
Thanks,
Andrew
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 01/11/16 15
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 03:21:29PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Here it is.
> I've confirmed that it emits to STRs for 4 byte aligned stores when
> -mtune=thunderx
> and still generates STP for the other tunings, though now sched-fusion is
> responsible for
> merging them, which is ok by me.
>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When storing a 64-bit immediate that has equal bottom and top halves we
> currently
> synthesize the repeating 32-bit pattern twice and perform a single X-store.
> With this patch we synthesize the 32-bit pattern once into a W re
On 24/10/16 17:15, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi all,
When storing a 64-bit immediate that has equal bottom and top halves we
currently
synthesize the repeating 32-bit pattern twice and perform a single X-store.
With this patch we synthesize th
On 31/10/16 11:54, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 24/10/16 17:15, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> When storing a 64-bit immediate that has equal bottom and top halves we
>>> currently
>>> synthesize the repeating 32-bit pattern t
On 31/10/16 13:42, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 31/10/16 11:54, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 24/10/16 17:15, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi all,
When storing a 64-bit immediate that has equal bottom and top halves we
currently
synthesize the
On 31/10/16 11:54, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 24/10/16 17:15, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi all,
When storing a 64-bit immediate that has equal bottom and top halves we
currently
synthesize the repeating 32-bit pattern twice and perform a singl
And here is the patch itself.
On 01/11/16 15:21, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 31/10/16 11:54, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 24/10/16 17:15, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi all,
When storing a 64-bit immediate that has equal bottom and top halves we
c
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 03:27:10PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When storing a 64-bit immediate that has equal bottom and top halves we
> currently
> synthesize the repeating 32-bit pattern twice and perform a single X-store.
> With this patch we synthesize the 32-bit pattern once i
Hi James,
On 8/21/19 1:48 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 03:27:10PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
When storing a 64-bit immediate that has equal bottom and top halves we
currently
synthesize the repeating 32-bit pattern twice and perform a single X-store.
With this
12 matches
Mail list logo
