Re: [PATCH] [pr#83069] Keep profile_count for bb under real_bb_freq_max

2017-11-28 Thread Siddhesh Poyarekar
On Friday 24 November 2017 05:36 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > freq_max < 1, i.e. highest frequency among bbs in the function being > higher than real_bb_freq_max means that the bb ends up with a profile > count larger than real_bb_freq_max and then can go all the way up to > and beyond profile_c

Re: [PATCH] [pr#83069] Keep profile_count for bb under real_bb_freq_max

2017-12-05 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/28/2017 04:34 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On Friday 24 November 2017 05:36 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: >> freq_max < 1, i.e. highest frequency among bbs in the function being >> higher than real_bb_freq_max means that the bb ends up with a profile >> count larger than real_bb_freq_max a