On Thu, 3 Mar 2016, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 2 March 2016 at 10:49, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > On 2 March 2016 at 10:16, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:56:30PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >>> On 1 March 2016
On 2 March 2016 at 10:49, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 2 March 2016 at 10:16, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:56:30PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>> On 1 March 2016 at 10:51, James Greenhalgh
On 2 March 2016 at 10:16, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:56:30PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> On 1 March 2016 at 10:51, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >>
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:56:30PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 1 March 2016 at 10:51, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at
On 1 March 2016 at 10:51, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > >
>> > > The following fixes
On 01/03/16 10:49, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 01/03/16 09:54, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James
On 1 March 2016 at 16:19, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 01/03/16 09:54, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>
> On 01/03/16 09:54, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >>>
> On Fri, Feb
On 01/03/16 09:54, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> The
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The following fixes PR69951, hopefully the
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > The following fixes PR69951, hopefully the last case of decl alias
> > > issues with alias analysis.
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > The following fixes PR69951, hopefully the last case of decl alias
> > issues with alias analysis. This time it's points-to and the DECL_UIDs
> > used in points-to sets not
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> The following fixes PR69951, hopefully the last case of decl alias
> issues with alias analysis. This time it's points-to and the DECL_UIDs
> used in points-to sets not being canonicalized.
>
> The simplest (and cheapest) fix
13 matches
Mail list logo