It should be same issue as
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/d0bbecb1c418b680505faa998fe420f0fd4bbfc1,
I gonna commit a fix for that.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 11:04 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/26/22 02:20, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > FAIL:
On 12/26/22 02:20, Andreas Schwab wrote:
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/dump-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:8:11: fatal error: gnu/stubs-ilp32.h: No such file or
directory
compilation terminated.
Isn't this really an indicator that the ILP32
: Andreas Schwab
Date: 2022-12-26 17:20
To: juzhe.zhong
CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; palmer
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add testcases for VSETVL PASS
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/dump-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:8:11: fatal error: gnu/stubs-ilp32
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/dump-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:8:11: fatal error: gnu/stubs-ilp32.h: No such file or
directory
compilation terminated.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510
Commited to trunk
於 2022年12月14日 週三 16:20 寫道：
> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/vlmax_bb_prop-1.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/vlmax_bb_prop-10.c: New test.
> *
Commited to trunk
於 2022年12月14日 週三 16:16 寫道：
> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/vlmax_miss_default-1.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/vlmax_miss_default-10.c: New test.
> *
Commited to trunk
於 2022年12月14日 週三 16:27 寫道：
> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/vlmax_back_prop-1.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/vlmax_back_prop-10.c: New test.
> *
Commited to trunk
於 2022年12月14日 週三 16:13 寫道：
> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/vlmax_phi-1.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/vlmax_phi-10.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/vlmax_phi-11.c: New test.
Hi Jeff:
> Ah, I should have looked at those regexps closer. Understood about the
> checking for hoisting the vsetvl. Though it makes me wonder if we'd be
> better off dumping information out of the vsetvl pass.
I've discussed adding an extra verify pass and a kind of rating
mechnish to
On 12/16/22 18:31, 钟居哲 wrote:
Register allocation (RA) doesn't affect the assembler checks since I
relax the registers in assmebler checks,
all assmebler checks have their own goal. For example:
The code like this:
+void foo2 (void * restrict in, void * restrict out, int n)
+{
+ for (int
:07
To: juzhe.zhong; gcc-patches
CC: kito.cheng; palmer
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add testcases for VSETVL PASS
On 12/14/22 01:09, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/rvv.exp: Adjust to enable tests
On 12/14/22 01:09, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/rvv.exp: Adjust to enable tests for VSETVL PASS.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/dump-1.c: New test.
*
12 matches
Mail list logo
