.zh...@rivai.ai; gcc-patches
CC: rdapp.gcc; kito.cheng; Kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix multiple EXCESS test FAILs in RVV testsuite
> Hmmm. I am not familiar with Binutils...
>
> I just adapted tests like others in the testsuite make them consistent.
> And turns out it
> Hmmm. I am not familiar with Binutils...
>
> I just adapted tests like others in the testsuite make them consistent.
> And turns out it can fix the issues..
I see where you're coming from, but can you assemble/link any
executable with -march=..._zvfh? Probably not? Doesn't half of
GCC's tests
; jeffreyalaw
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix multiple EXCESS test FAILs in RVV testsuite
> However, when I built the toolchain with -march=rv64gcv_zfh_zvfh.
> Then link fail.
Hmm, is it about zvfh or why does linking fail?
Regards
Robin
> However, when I built the toolchain with -march=rv64gcv_zfh_zvfh.
> Then link fail.
Hmm, is it about zvfh or why does linking fail?
Regards
Robin
all of these FAILs
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Robin Dapp
Date: 2023-10-25 16:35
To: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches
CC: rdapp.gcc; kito.cheng; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix multiple EXCESS test FAILs in RVV testsuite
Hi Juzhe,
I guess that's OK but what's the pr
hese tests like others.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Robin Dapp
Date: 2023-10-25 16:35
To: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches
CC: rdapp.gcc; kito.cheng; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix multiple EXCESS test FAILs in RVV testsuite
Hi Juzhe,
I guess that's OK but what's the pr
Hi Juzhe,
I guess that's OK but what's the problem here? Are the default options
wrong so we need to overwrite them instead of adding some?
Regards
Robin
