On 12/13/23 11:26, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 11:24:42AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/pr112822.C: Require C++17.
---
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr112822.C | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr112822.C
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 11:24:42AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * g++.dg/pr112822.C: Require C++17.
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr112822.C | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr112822.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr112822
On 12/12/23 21:36, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/12/23 17:50, Peter Bergner wrote:
On 12/12/23 1:26 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Am 12.12.2023 um 19:51 schrieb Peter Bergner :
On 12/12/23 12:45 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
+/* PR target/112822 */
Oops, this should be:
/* PR tree-optimization/112822
On 12/13/23 2:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 08:51:16AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Dec 2023, Peter Bergner wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/12/23 8:36 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
This test is failing for me below C++17, I think you need
// { dg-do compile { tar
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 08:51:16AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2023, Peter Bergner wrote:
>
> > On 12/12/23 8:36 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > This test is failing for me below C++17, I think you need
> > >
> > > // { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
> > > or
> > > // { dg-requ
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 12/12/23 8:36 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > This test is failing for me below C++17, I think you need
> >
> > // { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
> > or
> > // { dg-require-effective-target c++17 }
>
> Sorry about that. Should we do the above or s
On 12/12/23 8:36 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> This test is failing for me below C++17, I think you need
>
> // { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
> or
> // { dg-require-effective-target c++17 }
Sorry about that. Should we do the above or should we just add
-std=c++17 to dg-options? ...or do we ne
On 12/12/23 17:50, Peter Bergner wrote:
On 12/12/23 1:26 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Am 12.12.2023 um 19:51 schrieb Peter Bergner :
On 12/12/23 12:45 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
+/* PR target/112822 */
Oops, this should be:
/* PR tree-optimization/112822 */
It's fixed on my end.
Ok
Pushed
On 12/12/23 1:26 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> Am 12.12.2023 um 19:51 schrieb Peter Bergner :
>>
>> On 12/12/23 12:45 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
>>> +/* PR target/112822 */
>>
>> Oops, this should be:
>>
>> /* PR tree-optimization/112822 */
>>
>> It's fixed on my end.
>
> Ok
Pushed now that Martin
> Am 12.12.2023 um 19:51 schrieb Peter Bergner :
>
> On 12/12/23 12:45 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> +/* PR target/112822 */
>
> Oops, this should be:
>
> /* PR tree-optimization/112822 */
>
> It's fixed on my end.
Ok
Richard
> Peter
>
>
>
>
On 12/12/23 12:45 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> +/* PR target/112822 */
Oops, this should be:
/* PR tree-optimization/112822 */
It's fixed on my end.
Peter
On 12/12/23 10:50 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> The testcase has reasonable size but it is specific to ppc64le and its
> altivec vectors. My plan is to ask the bug reporter to massage it into
> a target specific testcase in bugzilla. Alternatively I can try to
> craft a testcase from scratch but tha
> Am 12.12.2023 um 17:50 schrieb Martin Jambor :
>
> Hi,
>
> PR 112822 revealed a corner case in load_assign_lhs_subreplacements
> where it creates invalid gimple: an assignment where on the LHS there
> is a complex variable which however is not a gimple register because
> it has partial defs
13 matches
Mail list logo
