El 12 de febrer de 2012 1:09, Gerald Pfeifer ha escrit:
> Given that both Mike and me considered this patch on the obvious
> side, I now committed the following variation thereof on trunk.
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
Given that both Mike and me considered this patch on the obvious
side, I now committed the following variation thereof on trunk.
(Note the line break and comment change. 5! = 120 did not seem
like a useful version number. ;-)
Gerald
Index: ginclude/stddef.h
=
El 6 de febrer de 2012 19:31, Mike Stump ha escrit:
>>> Looks obvious to me as well. I'd say let's put it in...
>>
>> Is this patch approved, then?
>
> I've not seen anyone approve it yet. I'm not a maintainer for that area, so,
> I cannot.
Who can approve it? Looking at the maintainers file
On Feb 4, 2012, at 11:20 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
> El 1 de febrer de 2012 1:06, Mike Stump ha escrit:
>> On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Robert Millan wrote:
Please consider this patch to stddef.h. GNU/kFreeBSD has the same
problem with __size
El 1 de febrer de 2012 1:06, Mike Stump ha escrit:
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Robert Millan wrote:
>>> Please consider this patch to stddef.h. GNU/kFreeBSD has the same
>>> problem with __size_t as FreeBSD does, since it inherits many kernel
>>> he
On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Please consider this patch to stddef.h. GNU/kFreeBSD has the same
>> problem with __size_t as FreeBSD does, since it inherits many kernel
>> headers from FreeBSD.
>
> The patch looks obvious to me, an
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Robert Millan wrote:
> Please consider this patch to stddef.h. GNU/kFreeBSD has the same
> problem with __size_t as FreeBSD does, since it inherits many kernel
> headers from FreeBSD.
The patch looks obvious to me, and I'll be happy to apply for
Robert if approved. Any taker?
