On 11/6/23 15:35, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
RVV is variable length vector but also has 256 bit VLS mode vector.
This test is vectorized as:
f:
vsetivlizero,8,e32,m2,ta,ma
vle32.v v2,0(a0)
vmv.v.i v4,1
vle16.v v1,0(a1)
vmseq.vvv0,v2,v4
On 11/6/23 20:30, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
>> So will this create a FAIL if someone runs the testsuite with the
autovec preference set to scalable?
No, it won't. Since it is always -fno-vect-cost-model.
When a scalable vector doesn't have 256bit vector, it always XFAIL, for
example, AR
e the fallbacks to VLS still
>> available when we prefer scalable vectors?
Yes. since it is -fno-vect-cost-model.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2023-11-07 11:23
To: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches
CC: rguenther
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Fix XPASS of bb-slp-43.c for RVV
On 11/6/23
Thanks Jeff. Just finish bootstrap +regression passed.
Committed.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2023-11-07 11:49
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; gcc-patches
CC: rguenther
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Fix XPASS of bb-slp-43.c for RVV
On 11/6/23 20:30, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote
