Re: [PATCH 1/3] targhooks: Extend legitimate_address_p with code_helper [PR110248]

On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 12:15 PM Kewen.Lin wrote: > > Hi Richi, > > on 2023/6/30 17:13, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Hi Richi, > > > > Thanks for your review! > > > > on 2023/6/30 16:56, Richard Biener wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 7:38 AM Kewen.Lin wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>>

Re: [PATCH 1/3] targhooks: Extend legitimate_address_p with code_helper [PR110248]

Hi Richi, on 2023/6/30 17:13, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: > Hi Richi, > > Thanks for your review! > > on 2023/6/30 16:56, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 7:38 AM Kewen.Lin wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> As PR110248 shows, some middle-end passes like IVOPTs can >>> query the ta

Re: [PATCH 1/3] targhooks: Extend legitimate_address_p with code_helper [PR110248]

Hi Richi, Thanks for your review! on 2023/6/30 16:56, Richard Biener wrote: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 7:38 AM Kewen.Lin wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> As PR110248 shows, some middle-end passes like IVOPTs can >> query the target hook legitimate_address_p with some >> artificially constructed rtx to dete

Re: [PATCH 1/3] targhooks: Extend legitimate_address_p with code_helper [PR110248]

On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 7:38 AM Kewen.Lin wrote: > > Hi, > > As PR110248 shows, some middle-end passes like IVOPTs can > query the target hook legitimate_address_p with some > artificially constructed rtx to determine whether some > addressing modes are supported by target for some gimple > statem