On 11/26/14 14:59, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:14:36AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
Are you talking about create_log_links? There can be no duplicates there
(anymore), that would be multiple defs of the same reg in the same insn,
indeed.
Yes, I was referring to the code in c
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:14:36AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> >Are you talking about create_log_links? There can be no duplicates there
> >(anymore), that would be multiple defs of the same reg in the same insn,
> >indeed.
> Yes, I was referring to the code in create_log_links. You dropped the
> c
On 11/25/14 14:47, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:46:52AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/14/14 12:19, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
With this new field in place, we can have LOG_LINKS for insns that set
more than one register and distribute them properly in distribute_links.
Thi
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:46:52AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/14/14 12:19, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >With this new field in place, we can have LOG_LINKS for insns that set
> >more than one register and distribute them properly in distribute_links.
> >This then allows many more PARALLELs to b
On 11/14/14 12:19, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
With this new field in place, we can have LOG_LINKS for insns that set
more than one register and distribute them properly in distribute_links.
This then allows many more PARALLELs to be combined.
Also split off new functions can_combine_{def,use}_p f
