Hi Joseph,
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 12:04:47PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > > I don't think we should support any of these. We tightened up various
> > > cases of void in parameter lists in C2y (constraint "A parameter
> > > declaration shall n
On Tue, 9 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > I don't think we should support any of these. We tightened up various
> > cases of void in parameter lists in C2y (constraint "A parameter
> > declaration shall not specify a void type, except for the special case of
> > a single unnamed paramet
Hi Joseph,
On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 09:34:23PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > BTW, I'm wondering about the following:
> >
> > alx@debian:~/tmp$ cat fwd.c
> > void j(void; int x);
> > void k(void; void);
> > void l(void; ...);
> >
Hi Chris,
On Sun, Sep 07, 2025 at 02:38:20PM +0100, Christopher Bazley wrote:
> > alx@debian:~/tmp$ cat fwd.c | nl
> > 1 void f(int n, int n; int n);
> > 2 void g(int n; int n; int n);
> > 3 void h(int n, int m; int n, int m);
> > 4 void i(int n; int m;
On 05/09/2025 11:33, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 11:15:26AM +0100, Christopher Bazley wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 6:57 PM Joseph Myers wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Hi Joseph,
On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 03:44:28PM +, Joseph Myers wr
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 11:15:26AM +0100, Christopher Bazley wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 6:57 PM Joseph Myers wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Joseph,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 03:44:28PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 3
On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 6:57 PM Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > Hi Joseph,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 03:44:28PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > On Wed, 3 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Joseph,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to ping ab
On Wed, 3 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 03:44:28PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Joseph,
> > >
> > > I'd like to ping about this thread.
> >
> > As far as I know, nothing has been resolved
Am Mittwoch, dem 03.09.2025 um 22:03 +0200 schrieb Alejandro Colomar:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 03:44:28PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Joseph,
> > >
> > > I'd like to ping about this thread.
> >
> > As far as I know, no
Hi Joseph,
On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 03:44:28PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > Hi Joseph,
> >
> > I'd like to ping about this thread.
>
> As far as I know, nothing has been resolved about the semantics (and then
> associated documentation and test
On Wed, 3 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> I'd like to ping about this thread.
As far as I know, nothing has been resolved about the semantics (and then
associated documentation and testcases) in the case of parameter forward
declarations where multiple declarations for a pa
Hi Joseph,
I'd like to ping about this thread.
Cheers,
Alex
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 12:44:29PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 11:19:39PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Joseph,
> > >
> > > On
Hi Joseph,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 11:19:39PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > Hi Joseph,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 10:03:00PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14 Aug 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > >
> > > > And I'm proposing it
Am Montag, dem 18.08.2025 um 23:19 + schrieb Joseph Myers:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > Hi Joseph,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 10:03:00PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14 Aug 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > >
> > > > And I'm proposing it as a GNU ex
On Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 10:03:00PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Aug 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> >
> > > And I'm proposing it as a GNU extension, which means we don't even need
> > > to care about what ISO C says abo
Hi Joseph,
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 10:03:00PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > And I'm proposing it as a GNU extension, which means we don't even need
> > to care about what ISO C says about [n]. We, as a quality
> > implementation, treat it with s
On Thu, 14 Aug 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> And I'm proposing it as a GNU extension, which means we don't even need
> to care about what ISO C says about [n]. We, as a quality
> implementation, treat it with stronger semantics, which this patch uses.
As a GNU extension, it's also necessary t
Hi Joseph,
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 06:44:07PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> We'd need standard wording that's gone through several rounds of review in
> WG14 before there's a reasonable basis for reviewing such a patch, given
> how it's based on a very different conceptual model to how array
> p
We'd need standard wording that's gone through several rounds of review in
WG14 before there's a reasonable basis for reviewing such a patch, given
how it's based on a very different conceptual model to how array
parameters are currently handled in the C standard. (And as noted on the
reflecto
19 matches
Mail list logo
