On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 at 22:12, Mark Harmstone wrote:
> Also, there are relocation types needed for Windows programs that are
> supported in COFF but not in ELF object files.
>
Right, it's been a long time since i last dealt with PECOFF and i had
assumed that things might have changed in the meant
On 22/2/24 11:11, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
Most of the free world has left COFF behind since several decades, so I won't
comment on that. YMMV.
This isn't helpful. Windows platforms use (a derivative of) COFF, so that's
what the tools need to use when targetting that platform.
Also,
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:56:46 +
Evgeny Karpov wrote:
> A ChangeLog template using "Moved... ...here" has been generated by
> contrib/mklog.py.
> It seems that it needs modification.
>
> Regards,
> Evgeny
>
> -Original Message-
> Thursday, February 22, 2024 12:11 PM
> Richard Earnsha
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 21/02/2024 21:34, rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
> > On 21 February 2024 19:34:43 CET, Evgeny Karpov
> > wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Please use git send-email. Your mail ends up as empty as here, otherwise.
>
> I don't see anything wrong with it;
On 21/02/2024 21:34, rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
> On 21 February 2024 19:34:43 CET, Evgeny Karpov
> wrote:
>>
>
> Please use git send-email. Your mail ends up as empty as here, otherwise.
I don't see anything wrong with it; niether does patchwork
(https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc
On 21 February 2024 19:34:43 CET, Evgeny Karpov
wrote:
>
Please use git send-email. Your mail ends up as empty as here, otherwise.
The ChangeLog has to be expressed in present tense, as mandated by the
standard; s/Moved/Move/g etc.
In any sane world ( and in gcc ) to fold, respectively a fold
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:38 AM Evgeny Karpov
wrote:
>
>
In config/i386/winnt.cc there are many x86_64 comments and many
function names that use i386 in them? When moving it seems like better
to rename them and remove references to 86.
I don't see any changes that rename the functions or comment
