> > I added cunrolle pass that differ from cunrolli by not allowing code size
> > growth even at -O3 (because we do not know what loops are hot yet).
> > We currently unroll tiny loop with 2 calls that I think needs to be tammed
> > down, I can do that if the patch seems to make sense.
>
> Please.
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> I was looking into reordering optimization queue of early passes. This is
> motivated by PR57249 and fact that I run into some super sily loops while
> looking into firefox dumps. It indeed makes a lot of sense for me as for
> code
> dealing with
