On 05/03/2016 06:39 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 05/03/2016 09:59 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>
>> And sometimes there are multiple acceptable ways of writing the
>> same code. Which wins is an aesthetic choice, which tools tend to
>> be bad at handling. E.g. if a parameter list is too long
On 05/03/2016 09:59 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
And sometimes there are multiple acceptable ways of writing the same code.
Which wins is an aesthetic choice, which tools tend to be bad at handling.
E.g. if a parameter list is too long for a line, there's often a choice
of how to balance the
On Tue, 3 May 2016, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> And sometimes there are multiple acceptable ways of writing the same code.
> Which wins is an aesthetic choice, which tools tend to be bad at handling.
> E.g. if a parameter list is too long for a line, there's often a choice
> of how to balance the
On 05/03/2016 03:59 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Jeff Law writes:
>> On 05/02/2016 02:40 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>>
>>> However, in the end, I think that yet-another-document is not the
>>> solution we want. What we actually need is a program that just formats
>>> your
Jeff Law writes:
> On 05/02/2016 02:40 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>
>> However, in the end, I think that yet-another-document is not the
>> solution we want. What we actually need is a program that just formats
>> your source according to the GNU Coding Style and that way you
On 05/02/2016 02:40 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
However, in the end, I think that yet-another-document is not the
solution we want. What we actually need is a program that just formats
your source according to the GNU Coding Style and that way you can always
tell your users "Run indent" and be
On 04/22/2016 12:21 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> (Apologies if you get this twice, the mailing list didn't like the
> html attachment in the first attempt).
>
> We frequently get malformatted patches, and it's been brought to my
> attention that some people don't even make the effort to read the
Bernd Schmidt writes:
> (Apologies if you get this twice, the mailing list didn't like the html
> attachment in the first attempt).
>
> We frequently get malformatted patches, and it's been brought to my
> attention that some people don't even make the effort to read the
On 04/22/2016 09:45 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 04/22/2016 10:42 AM, paul_kon...@dell.com wrote:
Would you expect people to conform to the abridged version or the
full standard? If the full standard, then publishing an abridged
version is not a good idea, it will just cause confusion.
On 04/22/2016 10:42 AM, paul_kon...@dell.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Bernd Schmidt
wrote:
(Apologies if you get this twice, the mailing list didn't like the
html attachment in the first attempt).
We frequently get malformatted patches, and it's been
On 04/22/2016 07:21 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> (Apologies if you get this twice, the mailing list didn't like the html
> attachment in the first attempt).
>
> We frequently get malformatted patches, and it's been brought to my attention
> that some people don't even make the effort to read the
On 04/22/2016 12:42 PM, paul_kon...@dell.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
(Apologies if you get this twice, the mailing list didn't like the html
attachment in the first attempt).
We frequently get malformatted patches, and it's been
> On Apr 22, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
> (Apologies if you get this twice, the mailing list didn't like the html
> attachment in the first attempt).
>
> We frequently get malformatted patches, and it's been brought to my attention
> that some people
13 matches
Mail list logo