pp.tomsich";
jeffreyalaw;
"christoph.muellner";
jinma; "cooper.qu"
主 题：Re: Re：[PATCH v5] RISC-V: Handle differences between XTheadvector and Vector
Why do you add theadvector shapes ? I think you can reuse the current existing
shapes.
+thead-vector-builtins.o: \+ $(srcdir)/con
Why do you add theadvector shapes ? I think you can reuse the current existing
shapes.
+thead-vector-builtins.o: \
+ $(srcdir)/config/riscv/thead-vector-builtins.cc \
+ $(CONFIG_H) $(SYSTEM_H) coretypes.h $(TM_H) $(TREE_H) $(RTL_H) \
+ $(TM_P_H) memmodel.h insn-codes.h $(OPTABS_H) $(RECOG_H) \
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/641733.html
This patch is ok from my side.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
发件人： joshua
发送时间： 2024-01-10 10:57
收件人： juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; gcc-patches
抄送： Jim Wilson; palmer; andrew; philipp.tomsich; jeffreyalaw;
christoph.muellner; jinma; cooper.qu
;; We don't use early-clobber for LMUL <= 1 to get better codegen.
(define_insn "*pred_cmp"
- [(set (match_operand: 0 "register_operand""=vr, vr,
vr, vr")
+ [(set (match_operand: 0 "register_operand""=vr, vr,
vr, vr, &vr, &vr, &vr, &vr")
