Re: Revert gcc r227962

2016-06-09 Thread Jeff Law
On 05/29/2016 08:33 AM, JonY wrote: On 5/23/2016 16:56, JonY wrote: On 5/20/2016 06:36, JonY wrote: On 5/20/2016 02:11, Jeff Law wrote: So if we make this change (revert 227962), my understanding is that cygwin bootstraps will fail because they won't find kernel32 and perhaps other libraries.

Re: Revert gcc r227962

2016-05-29 Thread JonY
On 5/23/2016 16:56, JonY wrote: > On 5/20/2016 06:36, JonY wrote: >> On 5/20/2016 02:11, Jeff Law wrote: >>> So if we make this change (revert 227962), my understanding is that >>> cygwin bootstraps will fail because they won't find kernel32 and perhaps >>> other libraries. >>> >>> Jeff >>> >> >>

Re: Revert gcc r227962

2016-05-23 Thread JonY
On 5/20/2016 06:36, JonY wrote: > On 5/20/2016 02:11, Jeff Law wrote: >> So if we make this change (revert 227962), my understanding is that >> cygwin bootstraps will fail because they won't find kernel32 and perhaps >> other libraries. >> >> Jeff >> > > I'll need to double check with trunk but

Re: Revert gcc r227962

2016-05-19 Thread JonY
On 5/20/2016 02:11, Jeff Law wrote: > So if we make this change (revert 227962), my understanding is that > cygwin bootstraps will fail because they won't find kernel32 and perhaps > other libraries. > > Jeff > I'll need to double check with trunk but gcc-5.3.0 built OK without it. The other

Re: Revert gcc r227962

2016-05-19 Thread Jeff Law
On 02/27/2016 03:39 AM, JonY wrote: On 2/27/2016 05:26, Jeff Law wrote: On 02/26/2016 04:04 AM, JonY wrote: Hi, I've submitted a patch that was committed as r227962, it causes some unintended side effects (namely libuuid on Cygwin). Can someone please revert? Kai still needs some time to

Re: Revert gcc r227962

2016-02-27 Thread JonY
On 2/27/2016 05:26, Jeff Law wrote: > On 02/26/2016 04:04 AM, JonY wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've submitted a patch that was committed as r227962, it causes some >> unintended side effects (namely libuuid on Cygwin). Can someone please >> revert? >> >> Kai still needs some time to setup his gcc

Re: Revert gcc r227962

2016-02-26 Thread Jeff Law
On 02/26/2016 04:04 AM, JonY wrote: Hi, I've submitted a patch that was committed as r227962, it causes some unintended side effects (namely libuuid on Cygwin). Can someone please revert? Kai still needs some time to setup his gcc development environment. We'd need to have a better sense of