On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
Hello Ramana
Can you respin this now that we are in stage1 again ?
Ramana
Attached the rebased, rechecked set of patches. Original with comments
posted in
On 04/30/2015 09:43 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com
wrote:
Hello Ramana
Can you respin this now that we are in stage1 again ?
Ramana
Attached the rebased, rechecked set of patches. Original with comments
posted
Christian
A general note, please reply to each of the patches with a rebased
patch as a separate email. Further more all your patches appear to
have dos line endings so they don't seem to apply cleanly. Please
don't have spurious headers in your patch submission - it then makes
it hard to ,
Hello Ramana
Can you respin this now that we are in stage1 again ?
Ramana
Attached the rebased, rechecked set of patches. Original with comments
posted in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02455.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02458.html
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to ping with a respin of the 7 patches for
the attribute target (thumb,arm) [0-6] :
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02455.html
In order to fix the various conflicts that have happened since, please
find attached the re-based patches to trunk rev #220529 (respectively
from above p0.patch, p1.patch, p2,patch, p3.patch, p4,patch, p5,patch,
p6,patch).
oops, please don't review p0.patch here. This last one will be
