时间：2024年1月10日(星期三) 15:17
收件人："cooper.joshua";
"gcc-patches"
抄 送：Jim Wilson; palmer;
andrew; "philipp.tomsich";
jeffreyalaw;
"christoph.muellner";
jinma; "cooper.qu"
主 题：Re: Re：[PATCH v5] RISC-V: Handle differences between XTheadvector and Vecto
pp.tomsich";
jeffreyalaw;
"christoph.muellner";
jinma; "cooper.qu"
主 题：Re: Re：[PATCH v5] RISC-V: Handle differences between XTheadvector and Vector
Why do you add theadvector shapes ? I think you can reuse the current existing
shapes.
+thead-vector-builtins.o: \+ $(srcdir)/con
muellner";
"cooper.joshua";
jinma; "cooper.qu"
主 题：Re: [PATCH v5] RISC-V: Handle differences between XTheadvector and Vector
Thanks for your patience.
LGTM from myside.
I think it's pretty clean now. I can image in the future when some day the
theadvector i
; cooper.qu
主题： Re：[PATCH v5] RISC-V: Handle differences between XTheadvector and Vector
Hi Juzhe,
Thank you for so many useful comments for this patch!
There are some more patches to support xtheadvector
special instrinsics as well as handle register overlap issue and
rewrite assembly output.
https
ot;type" "vicmp")
- (set_attr "mode" "")])
+ (set_attr "mode" "")
+ (set_attr "group_overlap" "th,th,th,th,none,none,none,none")])
You are add ", , , " which will be enabled when TARGET_VECTOR.
You shou
"cooper.joshua";
jinma; "cooper.qu"
主 题：Re: [PATCH v5] RISC-V: Handle differences between XTheadvector and Vector
Thanks for your patience.
LGTM from myside.
I think it's pretty clean now. I can image in the future when some day the
theadvector is no longer used, we c
Thanks for your patience.
LGTM from myside.
I think it's pretty clean now. I can image in the future when some day the
theadvector is no longer used, we can remove it very easily.
And also, the theadvector won't affect our RVV1.0 maintain since it's isolated
cleanly.
But I'd like to wait
