On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:46:49PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Martin Jambor wrote:
I just applied your patch on top of trunk revision 217032 on my
Ah,
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:46:49PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Martin Jambor wrote:
I just applied your patch on top of trunk revision 217032 on my
Ah, that explains it, thanks. This patch is a follow-up to
r217034. Still, I
Hello,
now that the update_address_taken patch is in, let me re-post the SRA
follow-up. With this patch, testcase pr60517.C (attached) has a use of an
undefined variable at the time of the uninit pass. Sadly, while this
warned with earlier versions of the other patch (when I was inserting
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 01:59:24PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
now that the update_address_taken patch is in, let me re-post the
SRA follow-up. With this patch, testcase pr60517.C (attached) has a
use of an undefined variable at the time of the uninit pass. Sadly,
while this
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Martin Jambor wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 01:59:24PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
now that the update_address_taken patch is in, let me re-post the
SRA follow-up. With this patch, testcase pr60517.C (attached) has a
use of an undefined variable at the time of the
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:17:22PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Martin Jambor wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 01:59:24PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
now that the update_address_taken patch is in, let me re-post the
SRA follow-up. With this patch, testcase pr60517.C
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Martin Jambor wrote:
I just applied your patch on top of trunk revision 217032 on my
Ah, that explains it, thanks. This patch is a follow-up to r217034. Still,
I didn't expect the ICE you are seeing by applying this patch to older
trunk, I'll try to reproduce that.
--
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Martin Jambor wrote:
I just applied your patch on top of trunk revision 217032 on my
Ah, that explains it, thanks. This patch is a follow-up to r217034. Still, I
didn't expect the ICE you are seeing by applying this patch to older
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
with this patch on top of
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02315.html
we finally warn for the testcase of PR 60517.
The new function is copied from init_subtree_with_zero right above. I guess
it
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 04:54:53PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
+ else if (access-grp_to_be_debug_replaced)
+{
Why would we care to create clobbers for debug stmts?! Are those
even valid?
It is not valid. Though, the fields supposedly live nowhere after the
clobber, so perhaps one
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
with this patch on top of
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02315.html
we finally warn for the testcase of PR 60517.
The new function is copied from init_subtree_with_zero right above. I guess
it
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
with this patch on top of
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02315.html
we finally warn for the testcase of PR 60517.
The new function is copied from
On 07/07/14 02:56, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
with this patch on top of
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02315.html
we finally warn for the testcase of PR 60517.
The new function is copied from
On July 7, 2014 11:32:10 AM CEST, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
wrote:
Hello,
with this patch on top of
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02315.html
we finally
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
The main idea of these patches is that when we read from a place that
was clobbered, instead of dropping the clobber and reading what was
there before, we can use a variable with a default definition to mark
that the content is undefined. This enables
Hello,
with this patch on top of
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02315.html
we finally warn for the testcase of PR 60517.
The new function is copied from init_subtree_with_zero right above. I
guess it might be possible to merge them into a single function, if
desired. I don't
16 matches
Mail list logo